![]() Through LETS, NASA intends to buy routine astronaut transportation services for the Artemis program through the late 2020s. companies to indicate their interest in competing for this contract. 28th, shortly after making their HLS selection, NASA issued a Request for Information (RFI) to U.S. At the same time, they are reminding companies like Blue Origin, Dynetics, and other commercial space entities that there will be opportunities again next year through their Lunar Exploration Transportation Services (LETS) contract. In short, NASA has indicated that it will be moving forward with SpaceX to develop the Starship HLS. “Through Artemis missions, NASA will lead the world in landing the first woman and first person of color on the lunar surface, conduct extensive operations on and around the Moon, and get ready for human missions to Mars.” industry for recurring crewed lunar landing services.” ![]() ![]() There will be forthcoming opportunities for companies to partner with NASA in establishing a long-term human presence at the Moon under the agency’s Artemis program, including a call in 2022 to U.S. “In addition to this contract, NASA continues working with multiple American companies to bolster competition and commercial readiness for crewed transportation to the lunar surface. In response to the ruling, NASA issued the following statement: The order to dismiss Blue Origin’s claims did not cite the precise reason for the decision, but a redacted copy of the judge’s opinion will be released on Nov. The GAO chose to deny these protests, which prompted Blue Origin to file suit in federal court. In this document, the Source Selection Authority (SSA) stated that NASA was forced to go with one contractor due to budget considerations. This was in reference to what NASA indicated in their Source Selection Statement, which accompanied the Apr. In a separate filing by Dynetics, they indicated how the selection of one company represented a failure on the part of NASA to consult all the parties involved. In addition, Blue Origin claimed that NASA had acted in bad faith, choosing to go with one design when initially, they indicated the desire to select two. Here too, Blue Origin claimed that a flawed evaluation was why Blue Origin was passed over in favor of SpaceX. This followed an appeal made by Blue Origin and Dynetics (another finalist for the HLS contract) to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Apr. Blue Origin filed suit with them back in August, claiming that NASA had selectively enforced safety requirements in the HLS bidding process, claiming that the Starship HLS was a risky design. government, mainly where federal contracts are concerned. Court of Federal Claims (as it exists today) was established in 1982 to address monetary claims against the U.S. While this means that SpaceX can get back to developing their concept – the Starship HLS – in preparation for the Artemis III missions, it is unclear if that mission will happen on schedule. This puts an end to nearly seven months of legal proceedings and gridlock following SpaceX’s selection back in April. ![]() Court of Federal Claims officially shot Blue Origin’s protest down. In a recently-announced decision, the U.S. This system is a vital piece of the Artemis Program mission architecture, which will be used in the coming years to transport crew and cargo to the lunar surface. This was none other than the legal action filed by Blue Origin in response to NASA selecting SpaceX to execute the Human Landing System (HLS) contract worth $2.9 billion. For months, the commercial space sector has waited for a pivotal case to be resolved. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |